(editor’s note: I couldn’t find the original video, if it exists. There are a host of fan-created ones such as this. It’s the music that matters.)

As usual, an oldie but a goodie. Probably inspired by an idiotic decision to spend some time playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare, which is essentially one long, interactive, game version of that leaked video of US helicopter pilots murdering journalists and civilians. The sequel, which has been one of the best-selling media properties ever, apparently has a section where you take on the role of a terrorist and murder civilians in an airport.I mean, I get it that it’s a sick, violent world out there and that we’re all partly responsible by allowing it to happen, but sheesh!

The insidious part for me (and the reason I say it was an idiotic decision), is how bloody addictive this and the other Call of Duty games are, and not to note that it’s extremely fun to play would be remiss. The originals were set in World War II, and while many people feel little remorse for killing lots and lots of Nazis, a game, even one that’s fictionalized, set in a modern war with middle eastern terrorists is just a little too close for comfort. It really is stuff like this (masterfully, artfully created) game that programs our perceptions of violent conflict.

(Editor’s note: I’m not sure if this is the original video, but it’s the only one I could find.)

Jonathan Safran Foer: The question is, if we don’t say no to this, what do we say no to? If we don’t say no to something that systematically abuses 50 billion animals, if we don’t say no to the number-one cause of global causing, and not by a little bit, but by a lot, if we don’t say no to what the UN has said is one of the top two or three causes of every significant environmental problem in the world, locally and globally, if we don’t say no to something that is clearly – not clear to me, but clear to the World Health Organization – a prime factor in the generation of Avian and Swine flus, if we don’t say no to something that’s making our antibiotics less effective and ineffective, if we don’t say no to something that causes 76 million of food-borne illness every year, just what do we say no to? This is not a case where we need to go to war with another country or spend a trillion dollars or elect a new government. We just need to say no to it.

In that vein, I wanted to share a comprehensive (not exhaustive – there’s a lot I left out, amazingly) collection of my links and bookmarks – everything from news sources to my friends who blog to stupid YouTube video aggregators. Some of these may be familiar, some not, but all are worth a look (all links open in a new tab or window).

Recent Finds:

Best of Craigslist – from novel-length explanations of why you should or should not be cruising the personals section looking for Mr./Ms./Mrs./? Right to where to get a duck egg that someone’s cat brought home for cheap. Always entertaining!

Best of Wikipedia – Twice a day, here you will find bizarre things on, or recently removed from, Wikipedia that you had no idea existed (today: “Triboluminescence“). Archiving this junk is exactly why the internet was invented. Except for porn that is.

Racialicious - Thoughtful, varied blogging on race issues and non-issues in contemporary culture.

News and politics:

The Daily Dish, by Andrew Sullivan – Hands down the most important political blog out there, and winner of the “Best Blog” category at least this year and probably previously. Written by a self-described “conservative” British expat who is homosexual, HIV-positive and married to an American. Thoughtful, exhaustive discussions and debates span the gamut of politics, religion, culture, war, civil rights and more.

Wonkette - A hyper-savvy political satire blog. Skews left but leaves no political misdeed unexposed, usually with a Blingee-enhanced picture attached.

Freakonomics - For when I want a fix of off beat economics-related wool-gathering. I highly recommend the book as a great way for those a bit intimidated by “the dismal science” to get initiated, and I am certainly convinced by their thesis that incentives (positive and negative) drive most of our behavior.

Climate Progress – I will refrain from listing the half-dozen or so “green” blogs (Green, Inc. being the first stop) and sites that I attempt to keep on top of, but this one is worth mentioning as a premiere source of climate change related no-holds-barred political commentary, backed up with studious scientific analysis. THE place for talking points when attempting to educate the flat-earth (aka climate change denial) crowd.

Also see: NYT, The Atlantic, New Yorker, Mother Jones, Reuters AlertNet, Ta-Nehisi Coates, Al-Jazeera English.

Arts and Culture:

Boing Boing – A directory of wonderful things that is one of the best sources of information for our wired, connected lives. Used to really capture the zeitgeist, but its writers are beginning to show their age and predictable patterns emerge. Thankfully they get an incredible variety of guest bloggers, from my buddy who helped launch the fantastical Atlas Obscura to a couple of Muslim bloggers who turned me onto All Things Pakistan.

Judith Warner – Blogs about women, motherhood, feminism and politics for the NYT. Good because it’s authentic.

Vice - Dirt dog takes over the mainstream. So played, and yet who else is there?

Consumerist - Look here before you buy anything. Also teaches you how to get results from any customer service rep in existence.

Things You Wouldn’t Know If We Didn’t Blog Incessantly (TYWKIWDBI) – Lots of interesting posts, from rare butterflies to old-timey photos.

Also see: Jezebel (and all of the other Gawker sites), Losanjealous, Buddyhead, Arab Parrot, This Isn’t Happiness

Comics:

Penny Arcade – About video games and stuff.

The Fart Party – About a whiny chick in Brooklyn.

Alien Loves Predator – Playing with dolls.

Foreign:

Pink Tentacle – Weird Japanese stuff.

Pestiside - Hungarian gossip in English.

PUFFF.hu – Hungarian electronic music site.

Funnies:

FailBlog - A guaranteed dose of “no matter how shitty I feel about my life, there’s always someone that’s more of a jackass than me.”

Fuck You, Penguin – Buy the book!

Item Not As Described – As described.

Dickipedia – A wiki of dicks. People, that is.

Also see: Passive Aggressive Notes Dot Com

Media:

The Big Picture – Awesomest mainstream photo blog I’ve found yet.

Pandora - Make up your own damn radio stations.

SomaFM - Groove Salad is the best ambient background funk around.

KCRW - One of the best NPR stations in the world.

Nations Photo Lab – Where I get prints done. Great prices and fine quality.

Today’s Big Thing – Viral videos.

Useful tools:

Flip - Makes your text uʍop ǝpısdn.

TinyURL - Makes a long link short.

Google News Timeline – Expresses news stories from a variety of selectable sources in a timeline that goes back decades.

GapMinder.org – Statistics about the thorny issues out there.

Good Guide – How environmentally and socially sustainable is your shampoo? How about your toothpaste?

Friends:

Curious Expeditions

Japandroo

YellyElly

Second Skin

Working Definition

Whew, that was a long list! You can see I sort of petered off there at the end. Probably I should get back to looking for a job now. Post your favorite links in the comments!

As the title of this post illustrates, the basic ideas at stake – renewable energy, climate change mitigation, poverty-reduction/development assistance in the third world and a tangible and hopefully long-lasting mutually beneficial relationship between a variety of cultures – are dear to my heart and mind.

Climate change and global poverty are the two biggest challenges humankind faces in the 21st century, and they happen to be inextricably linked. As well summed up in this comment, from the Green Inc. post, sub-Saharan countries will bear a disproportionate share of the terrible effects of global warming. Snip:

The African continent is uniquely vulnerable to climate shifts because 70 per cent of its workers are employed on rain-fed, small-scale farms, and farming is often the engine for national economies, generating export earnings and inexpensive food. Agriculture is the backbone of local economies and GDP in a number of African countries. On average, the sector accounts for 21 per cent of GDP (ranging from 10 to 70 per cent). In some countries, scientists project that farmers will harvest just 50% of current yields by 2020.

Based on this dire forecast, let’s take a look at some of the perceived benefits of these two projects. Both Desertec and Sahara Forest want to use large Concentrated Solar Power (CSP) arrays, with some solar photovoltaic (PV) input to generate power in the sun-rich, population-scarce deserts of northern Africa. CSP is both an old and new concept: using curved or flat mirrors to concentrate the sun’s light on a single focal point, through which water or another liquid is heated to super-high temperatures and is then used as steam to turn turbines and thus create electricity. PVs are solar panels, made mostly of silicon (aka sand), another bountiful resource in the desert.

Obviously, the need for much of the world’s energy demand to shift to carbon-neutral sources is imperative if we are to avoid catastrophic climate change, which, despite a few loud and stubborn (but nonetheless disproved) voices, is no longer a debated issue. For what might happen in a “business as usual” situation, please see this post at Climate Progress.

With both the Desertec and Sahara Forest projects, demand for this renewable energy is perceived to come mostly from Europe. Indeed, Germany itself probably uses as much energy as the entire continent of Africa, and as European countries work to combat their greenhouse gas emissions, more and more demand for renewables will keep the market strong. However, as African countries themselves continue to develop and industrialize, their consumption of energy resources will rise considerably, especially when factoring in the expected rise in population (expected to be around 2.225 billion in 2050). Although much attention is currently being paid to the way China is or is not attempting to fuel much of their own development with so-called green energy, there is a distinct potential here for countries with few natural resources or fossil fuels such as oil or coal but lots of sun and open land to leapfrog dirty industrial development straight to limitless, clean and free energy.

So essentially what we get is clean energy  for (initially) mostly European consumption, likely using the labor forces available in African countries. Here’s where things get sticky. The developed world’s record of interaction with most of Africa is abysmal. From the slave trade to colonization to apartheid to post-colonial political meddling and exploitation of natural resources by multinational corporations that has continued non-stop for hundreds of years and indeed right up to the present day, there is a serious gulf to be bridged in terms of trust and cooperation. While it is arguably true that most African countries are quite right to distrust any foreign energy schemes, it is also true that many of them are incapable or unwilling to develop on their own and are asking for aid trade with the international community. Corruption, bureaucracy and cultural or religious insularity could also hinder progress.

(I will leave aside for now the equally sticky issue of whether some countries should develop at all, or whether allowing some countries – Somalia comes to mind – to simply fester and possibly become havens for terrorist groups is an immediate security interest. I will say I am a firm supporter of a people’s right to self-determination, whether or not that leads to their own extinction or survival.)

Desertec seems to be aware of these issues. The very first of their Frequently Asked Questions list is the following:

Is this simply another way in which Europe will exploit Africa? What are the benefits for the MENA communities?

• The current situation is based on exploiting limited resources like gas and oil, but solar energy is practically unlimited and as such, the owners can’t be “exploited”.
• In the period up to 2050, the MENA Region could become as prosperous as Europe and urgently needs renewables for the generation of electricity and drinking water (considered in the TRANS-CSP study).
• Saving fossil fuels in the subsidized energy supply of African countries will allow selling the fuels more profitably on the world market.
• Earnings from export of electricity by using the unused potential of renewable energies.
• Jobs especially in the construction of solar collectors ==> income ==> building a middle class, instead of the emigration of well-qualified engineers.
• Consequences of climate change produced by Europe will hurt the MENA region first, so it’s only fair if Europe supports the introduction of renewables in MENA
• Technology transfer and development of training programs and studies for renewables in MENA is explicitly promoted by the European side in the framework of the Union for the Mediterranean

This answer isn’t especially explicit that “we will not exploit and plunder”, so as with all big agreements the details would have to be sussed out much further down the road. Furthermore, while the EU may be able to act in unison as an economic bloc, there is little reason to think that the northern African countries will also. Certainly they have their own problems, and if piecemeal agreements with different governments are not carefully crafted, there is a chance that a regional and/or local competition, say, in labor costs or environmental regulations or leases on tribal lands could lead to further strife.

What I’d hope is that agreements can be structured with long-term development in mind. That means training and employing local workers and contributing a good chunk of revenue to local economic development – meaning schools, hospitals, manufacturing, outsourced service centers (like the kind sprouting up all over India now and just starting in places like Rwanda, which I blogged about a while ago), agriculture and so on. It also means attention to the environment – so those high-voltage DC power lines will not be passing through villages and getting the locals killed, a la Shell Oil in Nigeria.

This is where I think the Sahara Forest project becomes quite interesting. While Desertec seems to be further along, likely because the SFP is a private enterprise as opposed to a EU-backed consortium, I love the idea of helping to increase the potential of the local agricultural economy, which is much closer to the traditions of the local people than manufacturing. The way it works is that the seawater used by the CSP arrays and greenhouses is purified in the process (through evaporation and filtration) and can then be used in orchards or jatropha plants (a native crop suitable for biofuel) nearby. As access to fresh water is also one of the paramount challenges of the 21st century, I see this as a triple solution. And that’s not factoring in any carbon-sequestration by the added forestation.

So while the concepts seem rosy, there are many barriers both real and perceived. These are summed up in this Treehugger post, and basically come down to this: it’s the political, not the technological challenges that stand in the way. North African countries are a long way from being considered “safe” places to invest the billions of dollars needed to get these projects up and running. Hell, we can’t even be sure our own unusually-progressive governmental majority can get a half-decent climate bill made into law.

What that means is that there’s time to wait, and for me, to plan. I see the destination, now I just gotta figure out how to get there.

UPDATE: It seems the below video isn’t working. Try the (stupid unembeddable) NYT video page here.

In order to be somebody, people must feel themselves part of something. In the nonviolent army, there is room for everyone who wants to join up. There is no color distinction. There is no examination, no pledge, except that, as a soldier in the armies of violence is expected to inspect his carbine and keep it clean, nonviolent soldiers are called upon to examine and burnish their greatest weapons – their heart, their conscience, their courage and their sense of justice.

…

Human beings with all their faults and strengths constitute the mechanism of a social movement. They must make mistakes and learn from them, make more mistakes and learn anew. They must taste defeat as well as success, and discover how to live with each. Time and action are the teachers.

MLK, Why We Can’t Wait, 1963.

Snip:

43. You

Charges: You think it’s your patriotic duty to spend money you don’t have on crap you don’t need. You think Hillary lost because of sexism, when it’s actually because she’s just a bad liar. You think Iraq is better off now than before we invaded, and don’t understand why they’re so ungrateful. You think Tim Russert was a great journalist. You’re hopping mad about an auto industry bailout that cost a squirt of piss compared to a Wall Street heist of galactic dimensions, due to a housing crash you somehow have blamed on minorities. It took you six years to figure out what a tool Bush is, but you think Obama will make it all better. You deem it hunky dory that we conduct national policy debates via 8-second clips from “The View.” You think God zapped humans into existence a few thousand years ago, although your appendix and wisdom teeth disagree. You like watching vicious assholes insult each other on TV. You support gun rights, because firing one gives you a chubby. You cuddle falsehoods and resent enlightenment. You think the fact that 43% of whites could stomach voting for an incredibly charismatic and eloquent light-skinned black guy who was raised by white people means racism is over. You think progressive taxation is socialism. 1 in 100 of you are in jail, and you think it should be more. You are shallow, inconsiderate, afraid, brand-conscious, sedentary, and totally self-obsessed. You are American.

Exhibit A: You’re more upset by Miley Cyrus’s glamour shots than the fact that you are a grown adult who is upset about Miley Cyrus.

Sentence: Invaded and occupied by Canada; all military units busy overseas without enough fuel to get back.

As the article has been linked from ten million sites, it’s not always possible to access it due to their undoubtedly off-the-charts bandwidth requests. But check back in a day or two if you can’t get there now. The idiots of 2008 won’t be disappearing that quickly.